A Match in Moscow

The setting was the Russia versus Rest of the World match, a team event staged in Moscow in September 2002 and played at rapid time controls. The format revived a famous Cold War tradition: the Soviet Union had crushed the Rest of the World in 1970 and won again, narrowly, in 1984. The 2002 edition pitted ten Russian players, led by Garry Kasparov, against ten of the strongest players from everywhere else. Judit Polgar of Hungary, then 26 years old and ranked among the world's top twenty, played for the Rest of the World team.

Kasparov arrived as the highest rated player in chess history to that point, rated 2838 and still clearly the world number one despite having lost his world championship title to Vladimir Kramnik in 2000. He had held the top spot on the rating list almost continuously since 1984. Polgar had played him many times since the early 1990s and had never beaten him. Their fifth round pairing in Moscow gave her the white pieces and one more chance.

The Weight of History

No game between these two players could ever be just a game. Kasparov had said in a late 1980s interview that women were by nature not suited to fighting chess at the highest level, remarks he was repeatedly asked about as the Polgar sisters rose through the world rankings. Judit, the youngest of the three, had been raised by her father Laszlo on the principle that genius is made, not born, and that a girl trained from childhood could compete with anyone. By 1991 she had become a grandmaster at 15, younger than Bobby Fischer had been.

There was also a specific wound. At Linares in 1994, Kasparov appeared to release a knight on one square and then place it on another against Polgar. Video footage suggested his hand had left the piece, which under the rules of chess commits a player to the move, but the arbiter allowed the game to continue and Kasparov won. Polgar never received redress, and the episode remained one of the most discussed controversies among famous chess players of the era. Eight years later, the score between them stood heavily in Kasparov's favour, with not a single Polgar win.

Turning the Berlin Against Its Victim

Polgar opened with 1.e4 and Kasparov answered with the Berlin Defence to the Ruy Lopez: 1...e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6. The choice was loaded with irony. The Berlin was the weapon Kramnik had used to neutralise Kasparov in their 2000 World Chess Championship match, steering game after game into a queenless endgame that Kasparov could not crack. Now Kasparov adopted the same wall himself.

Polgar went straight into the main line. After 4.O-O Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8, the queens were off by move eight and the players had reached the Berlin endgame: White with a sound kingside pawn majority and the safer king, Black with the bishop pair and a damaged but resilient structure. This is a battleground of pure chess strategy, where plans matter more than tactics and small inaccuracies accumulate. Polgar was superbly prepared. She developed actively, restrained Kasparov's bishops, and began advancing her kingside pawns, exactly the plan the Berlin demands of White and exactly the kind of technical grind in which Kasparov, paradoxically, had suffered before.

The Squeeze and the Resignation

What followed was not a single thunderbolt but a sustained demonstration of endgame mastery. Polgar's pieces took up dominant posts while Kasparov's bishops never found open diagonals. Her rooks seized the central files, her kingside majority rolled forward, and the world number one was reduced to passive defence, a posture utterly foreign to his style. Students of chess endgames still cite the game as a model of how to convert the Berlin structure's long-term assets.

As the time controls of rapid chess tightened the screw, Kasparov's position deteriorated beyond repair. Material began to fall and his remaining pieces were tied down with no counterplay in sight. After White's 42nd move, Kasparov stopped the clocks and resigned. There was no swindle to hope for and nothing left to defend. Judit Polgar had beaten the world's number one ranked player with the white pieces, in full view of a Moscow audience and the chess press of the world. Russia won the match overall by 52 points to 48, but the result everyone remembered came from board five of round five.

What the Victory Meant

The significance was understood instantly. In the long recorded history of the game, stretching back through the era of Howard Staunton and beyond, no woman had ever defeated the reigning world number one. Chess had been organised, written about and administered almost entirely by men for centuries, and the assumption that the very top of the game was male territory had hardened into something close to doctrine. Polgar's win did not merely dent that assumption. It falsified it, in public, against the strongest player alive.

Polgar herself was characteristically measured afterwards, treating the game as one more professional result. But she later acknowledged what it meant to finally beat Kasparov after a decade of trying, given everything he had said and everything that had happened at Linares. Kasparov, to his credit, came to give Polgar her full due in later years, describing her as the greatest female player the game has ever known. He remained world number one until his retirement in 2005; she remains the only woman ever to have broken into the world's top ten.

Legacy of a Milestone Game

The Moscow game now sits alongside the most celebrated famous chess games, not because of a brilliant sacrifice but because of what it proved. Polgar's career became the standing answer to every argument about women in chess: a top ten ranking, victories over eleven world champions past and future, and a place in the 2005 world championship tournament at San Luis. A generation of girls took up the game with her name as evidence that no ceiling was real.

The game is also a technical landmark. It showed that the Berlin endgame, far from being a drawing weapon only, could be won by White through patient strategic play rather than raw chess tactics. And it closed a circle of chess history: the player who had defined an era was beaten at his own game by the player who redefined who could belong in it. Both of them, that day, moved pieces of the standard Staunton pattern, the design that has framed every great moment in modern chess since 1849.

Jaques of London — Making Chess Sets Since 1849

By 2002, FIDE regulations mandated the Staunton pattern for all official competition, the design originally created by Jaques of London in 1849. The pieces Polgar and Kasparov handled in Moscow that day trace their lineage directly to the Jaques workshop in London, where the Staunton chess set was first turned more than 150 years earlier.

Shop Staunton Chess Sets →

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Was Judit Polgar's 2002 win really the first time a woman beat the world number one?

Yes, in the sense that matters most. When Judit Polgar defeated Garry Kasparov in Moscow on 9 September 2002, Kasparov held the number one position on the FIDE rating list, a position he had occupied almost without interruption since 1984. No woman had ever beaten the reigning world number one in a competitive game under any serious time control before that day. Polgar had faced Kasparov many times since the early 1990s and had never won, so the result broke both a personal drought and a historical barrier at the same time. The game was played at a rapid time control rather than classical, a fact Kasparov's supporters noted, but the symbolic weight of the result was immediate and has never faded.

Q: What opening was played in Polgar versus Kasparov, Moscow 2002?

Kasparov defended with the Berlin Defence to the Ruy Lopez, the same solid system Vladimir Kramnik had used to frustrate him in their 2000 world championship match in London. The Berlin leads to an early queen exchange and a queenless middlegame in which White holds a healthy kingside pawn majority while Black relies on the bishop pair and long-term solidity. Polgar, playing White, was happy to enter exactly the kind of position that had tormented Kasparov two years earlier. She handled the endgame with energy and precision, activated her pieces, advanced her pawn majority, and gradually squeezed Black's position until it collapsed. Kasparov resigned after White's 42nd move, the first time he had ever lost to a woman.

Q: Why was the rivalry between Polgar and Kasparov so charged?

Kasparov had publicly questioned whether women could compete at the very top of chess, remarks from the late 1980s that followed him for decades and that Polgar was acutely aware of. The tension sharpened at Linares in 1994, when Kasparov appeared to release a knight on one square and then move it to another during their game. Video footage suggested his hand had left the piece, which under the rules would have committed him to the move, but the arbiter allowed play to continue and Kasparov went on to win. Polgar felt deeply wronged by the episode. Against that background, her clean victory over him in Moscow in 2002 carried a personal dimension far beyond the scoreboard.

Q: How strong a player was Judit Polgar at her peak?

Judit Polgar is by common consent the strongest female chess player in history, and the gap to second place is enormous. She became a grandmaster in 1991 at the age of 15, breaking Bobby Fischer's long-standing record as the youngest grandmaster ever at that time. She is the only woman ever to have entered the world's top ten, peaking at number eight on the rating list in 2005, and the only woman to have played in a world championship tournament for the overall title, which she did at San Luis in 2005. Across her career she defeated eleven players who held the world championship at some point, including Kasparov, Karpov, Spassky, Anand, Topalov, Kramnik and Carlsen.