The Split That Created Two World Champions

To understand the 1995 match, it is necessary to understand the fracture that preceded it. In 1993, Garry Kasparov and his challenger Nigel Short announced they would contest their world championship outside FIDE's authority, under the newly formed Professional Chess Association. Their stated grievances included FIDE's handling of commercial rights, the transparency of its selection process, and what both players characterised as an organisation that had failed to serve elite professional chess. FIDE responded decisively and controversially: it stripped Kasparov of his official world championship title and staged a rival match between Anatoly Karpov and Jan Timman. From that moment until 2006, the World Chess Championships existed in a state of formal division, with two bodies simultaneously claiming legitimacy. The PCA title, held by Kasparov from 1993, was the one most grandmasters and commentators treated as the authentic succession from the classical title lineage, given that Kasparov had never been beaten across the board.

The Players and the Stakes in 1995

Kasparov arrived in New York as arguably the most dominant world champion in the history of the game. His rating of 2795 was far beyond any rival. He had held the world title since defeating Karpov in 1985 and had successfully defended it through four subsequent matches against the same opponent. By 1995 he was 32 years old, at the absolute summit of his powers, and possessed of a preparation apparatus, backed by his team of seconds, that had no equal in competitive chess. Viswanathan Anand, then 25, had emerged as the natural challenger through a combination of speed, tactical brilliance, and a capacity for novelty in the opening that few players could match. India's first grandmaster, Anand had become a genuine fan favourite worldwide, his swift, intuitive style a striking contrast to the industrial preparation of the champion. Among famous chess players of the era, the contrast between their methods was as striking as the contrast in their personalities.

New York, the World Trade Center, and the Match Conditions

The decision to stage the match at the World Trade Center was a statement of intent by the PCA. The Twin Towers carried an obvious symbolic weight for a championship that was itself a challenge to an established order. Intel Corporation served as the primary sponsor, bringing significant commercial investment into the match and supporting the development of online chess coverage at a moment when the internet was beginning to reach a mass audience. Games were relayed via the early web in a format that drew unprecedented online viewership for a chess event. The match was played to a maximum of 24 games with the first player to 12.5 points declared champion. Time controls were 40 moves in two hours, followed by 20 moves per hour, with adjournments abolished in favour of sealed moves and then, in keeping with modernising practice, sessions continued until conclusion. The setting was grand. The tension between the players, never warm, was palpable from the opening ceremony.

The Course of the Match and Key Games

Kasparov struck first, winning Game 1 in a Ruy Lopez that demonstrated his preparation was operating at a level beyond anything Anand had anticipated. Game 2 was drawn after fierce fighting. Kasparov then won Game 4 to establish a lead he never surrendered. Anand fought back to win Game 7 in a display of tactical brilliance that temporarily lifted the mood of his supporters, but Kasparov responded by winning Game 8. The match became a genuine contest of wills in the middle games, with both players producing fighting chess of the highest quality. Anand's victories in Games 7, 14 and 16 showed he was capable of beating Kasparov across the board on his best days, but those days were outnumbered. The opening preparation on display throughout was described by many commentators as the most sophisticated yet seen at world championship level, a harbinger of the computer-assisted preparation that would come to define elite chess in the following decade. Students of famous chess games continue to study several encounters from this match for their theoretical significance.

Kasparov's Opening Mastery

Much of the technical discussion surrounding the 1995 match concerns Kasparov's handling of the Ruy Lopez, one of the oldest and most thoroughly analysed openings in all of chess history. Kasparov and his team had prepared deep novelties in the Open Variation and the Marshall Attack that repeatedly caught Anand in positions where his famously rapid calculation could not fully compensate for the lack of preparation time. In several games, Kasparov's innovations came on move 20 or later, in positions of extraordinary complexity, suggesting preparation depths that his opponent could not match in real time. Anand, never one to avoid the sharpest lines, accepted the challenge and played fighting chess throughout. The Sicilian Defence appeared in several games as Anand sought counterplay, and he scored his wins in lines where his tactical vision could overcome the positional pressure Kasparov applied. The match set a standard for opening preparation that influenced world championship play for the next decade.

Legacy and What the Match Settled

The 1995 PCA World Chess Championship settled one question definitively and left another open. It confirmed beyond serious dispute that Kasparov remained the strongest player in the world, unbeaten in world championship play and apparently still improving. But it also confirmed Anand as the heir apparent, the player most likely to eventually claim the title. That confirmation proved accurate: Anand became FIDE World Champion in 2000, won the reunified world championship in 2007 against Vladimir Kramnik, and held the undisputed title until Magnus Carlsen defeated him in 2013. For the longer arc of World Chess Championships, the 1995 match sits at a pivotal point. It was among the last title matches of the pre-computer-dominated era, played at a moment when human preparation still drove the theoretical agenda. Within a few years, engines would transform how the game was studied and contested at every level, fundamentally changing what it meant to be prepared. The pieces used across all 18 games conformed to the Staunton chess set design, as they have done at every world championship since the standard was established. The lineage of that design traces directly to Jaques of London, whose workshop created the universal pattern that governs competitive chess equipment to this day.

Jaques of London — Making Chess Sets Since 1849

FIDE regulations, which mandate the Staunton pattern originally created by Jaques of London in 1849, governed all equipment standards in this era, and the PCA likewise adopted the same universal design for the 1995 match. The pieces on the board at the World Trade Center traced their design lineage directly back to the Jaques workshop in London, where the standard was set over 175 years ago. Jaques of London, founded in 1795 and still producing Staunton chess sets today, established the piece design that every serious game of chess at every level continues to use.

Shop Staunton Chess Sets →

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What was the final score of the 1995 World Chess Championship between Kasparov and Anand?

Garry Kasparov defeated Viswanathan Anand by a score of 10.5 to 7.5 over 18 games, retaining the PCA World Chess Championship title. The match was played at the World Trade Center in New York from September to October 1995. Kasparov won four games outright, Anand won three, and eleven games were drawn. Kasparov's dominance was most pronounced in the early stages of the match, where he built a commanding lead that Anand was unable to overcome despite several fighting efforts in the second half of the contest.

Q: Why was the 1995 World Chess Championship held under the PCA rather than FIDE?

In 1993, Garry Kasparov and Nigel Short broke away from FIDE, the traditional governing body of world chess, to play their world championship match under the newly formed Professional Chess Association. Kasparov objected to FIDE's handling of the title cycle, commercial arrangements, and the selection process for challengers. FIDE responded by stripping Kasparov of his title and staging a rival world championship between Anatoly Karpov and Jan Timman. The chess world then had two simultaneous claimants to the world championship title until reunification in 2006 under Vladimir Kramnik. The 1995 Kasparov-Anand match was the second PCA world championship.

Q: What openings were played in the 1995 Kasparov vs Anand World Chess Championship?

The 1995 match is remembered for its extraordinary level of opening preparation on both sides. Kasparov employed the Ruy Lopez with notable effect, producing deep novelties in the Open Variation and positions that repeatedly outpaced Anand's preparation. Anand responded with sharp Sicilian Defence lines and fought hard in Spanish Counter-Attack variations. The most discussed theoretical battles arose in the Ruy Lopez, where Kasparov's home preparation proved decisive in several games. The match demonstrated that at the highest level, preparation had become a decisive competitive weapon in its own right, not merely a support to over-the-board creativity, and anticipated the computer-assisted preparation era that followed.

Q: Was Viswanathan Anand's performance in 1995 considered a failure?

Far from it. Anand's performance in 1995 established him as the clearest challenger to Kasparov's supremacy and confirmed him as the future of world chess. Losing 7.5 to 10.5 to the strongest player of the era, a man who had never been defeated across a world championship match, carried no disgrace. Anand won three games and played several others on level terms. The match accelerated his development as a complete player. He would go on to become FIDE World Champion in 2000 and won undisputed world championship titles from 2007, holding the crown until Magnus Carlsen defeated him in 2013 in a match that itself became one of the defining moments in modern chess history.